Hugo vs Simply Static 1

Hugo vs Simply Static

Compare Hugo vs Simply Static and explore which static site generator is for you.
Both are popular solutions for running static sites, let’s see how they differ.

Why Choose Simply Static, the Hugo Alternative

Avoid complicated instructions, markdown, and frameworks.
See why over 40,000+ users choose the easier-to-use Simply Static over Hugo for their static website.

Simply Static vs Hugo Features

Simply Static and Hugo both allow you to create a static website, but they work differently.

Using Hugo, you’ll create a new site and add content using the command line and markdown. It’s a complicated process that requires you to be knowledgeable in creating layouts, templates, and static content in markdown files.

When using Hugo, you’re also restricted by the look and feel of your finished static website. Hugo has a range of templates/Hugo themes you can use and customize, but it lacks the user-friendly nature of, for example, WordPress.

Simply Static allows you to create your website in WordPress and then make it static with a click of a button. This way, you can keep WordPress as your CMS (content management system) but get all the benefits of a static website. It’s as easy as that.

Pricing

free

$69 / year

Can run locally (on your computer)

Includes WordPress Hosting

Free version available

Extendable

WP-CLI support

No-Code

Deployment methods

GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify, and Amazon AWS S3

ZIP, local directory, GitHub (GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify..), Amazon AWS S3, BunnyCDN, or via SFTP

Search integration

Forms & Comments integration

Multilingual support

Incremental static site updates

One-Click Basic Auth

Minification

Hide WordPress

Image Optimization

Premium Support